CELPIP Listening Part 6 Practice Test: Condo Dog Parks
By Iris
A free Listening Part 6 practice test in the CELPIP format: 6 questions with the answer key. Play each recording once, as in the real test, answer, then check your answers at the bottom of the page. The transcript is under each recording.
Ohlsson attributes the drop in barking complaints to dogs
Pankratz's data shows that among reported fear-based incidents, young dogs
Pankratz's condition for supporting new parks centres on
Castellano's main concern about the dog park plan is
Ohlsson and Pankratz both suggest off-leash time works best when
The way this story is told hints that
Transcript (read it after you answer)
MAN: As more residents raise dogs in condo buildings, Vancouver is seeing growing pressure to add fenced dog parks where off-leash space has been scarce. Building managers trace the recent surge to a bylaw change: some time ago, the city's condo bylaw was amended to allow two dogs per unit instead of one. Registered dog counts in surveyed buildings have risen substantially since then. Animal-welfare advocate Renata Ohlsson strongly supports expanding dog parks. "My own dog used to bark nonstop until we started letting her burn off steam every morning — now she just naps," she says. She points to a trial in one nearby building that added a supervised, one-hour off-leash session each morning in its courtyard. Within months, noise complaints about barking there fell noticeably, which Ohlsson attributes to dogs getting enough activity to settle rather than bark from pent-up energy. Veterinary behaviourist Julian Pankratz is more cautious. He cites data from a comparable city's unsupervised dog park: very young dogs, though a minority of visitors, were involved in more than sixty percent of reported fear-based incidents. Young, undersocialized dogs, he explains, are more likely to trigger or absorb rough play from older, established dogs. Pankratz worries owners assume any off-leash time is automatically beneficial, when a chaotic, unsupervised park can leave a nervous dog more anxious than a quiet leashed walk. He would support new parks only if they included a separate, fenced area for smaller dogs, apart from larger groups — structured the way Ohlsson's supervised morning session already is, not left to sort itself out. Condo board member Felix Castellano has a different worry: consultation. The proposed dog park would serve residents from several neighbouring buildings that share the block's courtyard access, but the site-selection survey went only to residents of the one building hosting the park. Castellano's worry isn't that non-dog-owners dislike the idea, but that most future users never had any say in where the park went. He wants any new park to include a shared oversight committee with a seat for each neighbouring building before construction begins. The city is already testing a fenced small-dog area in one existing park, staffed by a part-time attendant each evening to mediate conflicts. Parks officials say attendance numbers alone won't tell them whether dogs are socializing well, or whether disputes are quietly keeping residents away. City councillor Aisha Bloom chairs the parks committee. She proposed a middle path: launch the small-dog area as planned, but log every incident so Castellano's committee can review real data before deciding whether to expand. That data-driven approach was the only proposal that drew applause from both sides of the room.
This is Part 6 of CELPIP Listening Practice Test 43. Take all 6 parts (38 questions) for a score and an estimated CLB.
Answer key
Show all 6 answers
- Ohlsson attributes the drop in barking complaints to dogs B. getting enough activity to settle
- Pankratz's data shows that among reported fear-based incidents, young dogs C. make up a small share of visitors but most of the incidents
- Pankratz's condition for supporting new parks centres on C. separating small dogs from larger ones
- Castellano's main concern about the dog park plan is A. residents were never fairly consulted
- Ohlsson and Pankratz both suggest off-leash time works best when B. it's supervised or structured, not open-ended
- The way this story is told hints that C. the compromise satisfies both sides
More Part 6 sample tests
- Capping Top Pay (next)
- The Weight of a Score
- The Right to Be Unreachable
- Downtown Public Washrooms Return to the Agenda
- Firm Debates Employee-Chosen Schedules
- Advantages of Urban Rooftop Gardens
- Autonomous Vehicles
- Benefits and Challenges of Electric Scooters in Cities
- Carbon Capture Technologies
- Challenges of Implementing Smart City Technologies
All 124 Part 6 sample tests · Part 6 format, tips and FAQs · Full-length Listening practice tests · Free CELPIP practice test
CELPass is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with Paragon Testing Enterprises. CELPIP is a trademark of Paragon Testing Enterprises. Check the official CELPIP website and IRCC for current test rules and requirements.