Start free
CELPIP Listening Part 6: Listening to Viewpoints

CELPIP Listening Part 6 Practice Test: Who Should Clear the Sidewalk?

By Iris

A free Listening Part 6 practice test in the CELPIP format: 6 questions with the answer key. Play each recording once, as in the real test, answer, then check your answers at the bottom of the page. The transcript is under each recording.

Questions
6
Format
1 recording, questions after it
Question style
Multiple choice, 4 options
Play like the real test
Each recording plays once, then each question with 30 seconds to answer (Parts 4–6: one timer for the part). No pausing to replay, like test day.
  1. The report is mainly about

  2. Why does Gauthier mention wheelchairs and strollers?

  3. What concerns Okafor most about the fines?

  4. Why does Okafor mention the streets outside people's homes?

  5. Gauthier would most likely agree that

  6. What does the speaker conclude?

Transcript (read it after you answer)

NARRATOR: Every winter, a familiar ritual unfolds on Canadian sidewalks: some residents emerge at dawn with shovels, while others leave the snow untouched until a thaw does the work for them. Many towns and cities have responded with bylaws requiring homeowners to clear the walkway in front of their property within a day of a snowfall, backed by fines that can climb into the hundreds of dollars. Whether such penalties are prudent policy or simply a convenient way for cities to offload an unglamorous obligation has become a surprisingly heated question. Few local rules stir up quite so much feeling.

NARRATOR: For accessibility advocate Renée Gauthier, the matter is fairly simple. A single neglected stretch of sidewalk, she points out, can strand someone in a wheelchair or a parent pushing a stroller for the length of an entire block. Warnings should come first, naturally, and nobody wants to see a pensioner punished over a light dusting. But without a credible penalty, she contends, shovelling becomes optional, and the people who suffer are precisely those least able to clamber over a frozen ridge. For those people, she says, a missed walk is not a nuisance but a wall.

NARRATOR: Urban economist Martin Okafor finds this reasoning sympathetic yet ultimately misdirected. Cities, he observes, would never ask residents to plow the street outside their homes; roads are treated as shared infrastructure, maintained collectively through taxes. Sidewalks, in his view, deserve identical treatment. It is, he says, a matter of who we think the sidewalk belongs to. What troubles him most is who actually ends up paying. Because enforcement depends largely on complaints from neighbours, fines tend to land on elderly or disabled homeowners who physically cannot shovel, the very residents such bylaws claim to protect. Clearing an entire network is hardly cheap, but a single sidewalk plow, he argues, does in an hour what dozens of households manage with wildly uneven diligence.

NARRATOR: Gauthier remains unconvinced. City crews, she notes, already struggle to keep major roads open after a serious storm, and when budgets tighten, sidewalks are always the first thing to slip. A fine, for all its imperfections, at least places responsibility somewhere specific.

NARRATOR: Each position contains an uncomfortable truth. Fines produce tidier sidewalks on paper while quietly burdening those with the fewest options, and collective clearing promises fairness at a price few councils have shown much appetite to pay. Perhaps the more sensible path lies somewhere in between: subsidized help for residents who genuinely cannot shovel, and penalties reserved for those who simply choose not to.

0 of 6 answered

Answer key

Show all 6 answers
  1. The report is mainly about A. whether penalties are the best way to keep walkways clear.
  2. Why does Gauthier mention wheelchairs and strollers? D. to show how one owner's neglect affects others
  3. What concerns Okafor most about the fines? B. They often fall on residents they were meant to help.
  4. Why does Okafor mention the streets outside people's homes? C. to argue that sidewalks should be a public duty
  5. Gauthier would most likely agree that A. a city-run service could be neglected when money is short.
  6. What does the speaker conclude? D. Combining support with selective fines may be fairest.

More Part 6 sample tests

All 124 Part 6 sample tests · Part 6 format, tips and FAQs · Full-length Listening practice tests · Free CELPIP practice test

CELPass is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with Paragon Testing Enterprises. CELPIP is a trademark of Paragon Testing Enterprises. Check the official CELPIP website and IRCC for current test rules and requirements.