Start free
CELPIP Reading Part 3: Reading for Information

CELPIP Reading Part 3 Practice Test: Zoning Reform And Housing

By Iris

A free Reading Part 3 practice test in the CELPIP format: 9 questions with the answer key. Choose your answers, then check them at the bottom of the page.

Questions
9
Time
about 10 minutes
Question style
Match each statement to a paragraph

Paragraph A

By dividing a municipality into districts, zoning ordinances determine not merely where construction occurs but what form it may take. In much of North America and Australia, the largest residential districts admit only detached houses on individual lots, a category planners call low-density or exclusionary zoning. Surveys of major Canadian and American cities have found that such districts cover between 60 and 80 percent of land zoned for housing, and in several suburbs the share exceeds 90 percent. Reform proposals, generally described as upzoning, permit duplexes, triplexes, or small apartment buildings in those same districts. More than a dozen states and provinces have adopted some version since 2018.

Paragraph B

The pattern originated after 1910, when American courts upheld separating housing from industry and municipalities extended that power to distinguish among housing types. The rules work less through outright prohibition than through numerical requirements: a minimum lot area, a maximum floor-area ratio, front and side setbacks, and a fixed number of parking spaces per dwelling. Because these figures multiply, a lot large enough for four units under the density limit may accommodate only one once setbacks and parking aisles are subtracted. Reform statutes therefore usually amend the numbers rather than the district map.

Paragraph C

Evidence from early adopters is neither uniform in outcome nor uncontested in interpretation. Auckland, which upzoned about three-quarters of its residential land in 2016, subsequently permitted substantially more housing than researchers estimated would have occurred without the reform, and economists have linked the additional supply to slower rent growth. Minneapolis adopted citywide permission for up to three units in 2019 but initially recorded few projects under that provision. The city separately removed parking minimums in 2021, so explanations for the limited early response must distinguish regulations that remained during the first years from barriers such as financing, construction costs, and small-lot design. Land values can also rise after upzoning, sometimes delaying redevelopment.

Paragraph D

Rather than await local votes, provincial and state governments increasingly impose upzoning on municipalities, sometimes making infrastructure grants conditional on compliance. Municipal engineers report that added units rarely strain water and sewer networks in older neighbourhoods, though street parking pressure is common where transit is sparse. Residents' associations continue to challenge approvals, arguing that construction noise and altered streetscapes fall on existing owners while gains accrue to developers. Most analysts expect measurable effects on rents only over a decade, since permitted buildings must still be financed and built, and few jurisdictions have yet reported a full construction cycle.

Paragraph E

Not given in any of the above paragraphs.

Decide which paragraph, A to D, has the information given in each statement below. Select E if the information is not given in any of the paragraphs.

  1. Observed underproduction resists monocausal attribution because several constraints remained binding.
  2. Land-use separation expanded from incompatible activities to differentiated residential forms.
  3. Legal capacity diffused geographically while broadening permissible residential form.
  4. Local opposition frames redevelopment gains and externalities as asymmetrically distributed.
  5. Anticipated appreciation can rationally defer construction after legal capacity expands.
  6. Interacting dimensional constraints produce lower feasible density than nominal zoning allows.
  7. Infrastructure grants are withheld until municipal engineers certify network capacity.
  8. Infrastructure tolerance coexists with parking exposure under weak transit substitution.
  9. Residential zoning reserves most surveyed land for its least intensive form.
0 of 9 answered

Answer key

Show all 9 answers
  1. Observed underproduction resists monocausal attribution because several constraints remained binding. C
  2. Land-use separation expanded from incompatible activities to differentiated residential forms. B
  3. Legal capacity diffused geographically while broadening permissible residential form. A
  4. Local opposition frames redevelopment gains and externalities as asymmetrically distributed. D
  5. Anticipated appreciation can rationally defer construction after legal capacity expands. C
  6. Interacting dimensional constraints produce lower feasible density than nominal zoning allows. B
  7. Infrastructure grants are withheld until municipal engineers certify network capacity. E
  8. Infrastructure tolerance coexists with parking exposure under weak transit substitution. D
  9. Residential zoning reserves most surveyed land for its least intensive form. A

More Part 3 sample tests

All 176 Part 3 sample tests · Part 3 format, tips and FAQs · Full-length Reading practice tests · Free CELPIP practice test

CELPass is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with Paragon Testing Enterprises. CELPIP is a trademark of Paragon Testing Enterprises. Check the official CELPIP website and IRCC for current test rules and requirements.