CELPIP Reading Practice Test 37
By Iris
A complete CELPIP Reading practice test: all 4 parts and 38 questions in the real test order. Set a timer for 55–60 minutes and do all four parts in one sitting. Check your answers at the bottom of the page to see your score and an estimated CLB.
In this test
- Part 1: Reading Correspondence, “Confirmation of Attendance for a Professional Conference” (questions 1–11) · practise this part alone
- Part 2: Reading to Apply a Diagram, “Fresh Produce Venues” (questions 12–19) · practise this part alone
- Part 3: Reading for Information, “The Ancient Art of Aztec Featherwork: Crafting with Plumes” (questions 20–28) · practise this part alone
- Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints, “Legalizing Ride-Sharing Services: Innovation vs. Regulation” (questions 29–38) · practise this part alone
Part 1: Reading Correspondence
Dear Conference Organizers,
We are delighted to confirm our attendance at the Global Tech Summit, scheduled for April 20–22 in Singapore. Our delegation of five senior engineers will participate in workshops on AI ethics and cybersecurity trends, which align with our company’s innovation priorities. We look forward to networking with industry leaders and exploring collaborative opportunities. Please reserve spots for us in the keynote sessions and the AI panel discussion. Additionally, we are interested in sponsoring a breakout session to showcase our latest software solutions.
Could you provide details on sponsorship packages? Please confirm our workshop registrations and share the final agenda. How might we maximize our visibility during the event?
What is the primary purpose of the email?
What can be inferred about the company’s goals?
How does the sender convey enthusiasm?
What is the implied benefit of sponsoring a session?
Which question focuses on strategic exposure?
What bias might the sender exhibit?
Here is a response to the message. Complete the response by filling in the blanks. Select the best choice for each blank.
Dear Team,
We’re thrilled to have you at the Global Tech Summit. Your registrations for the AI ethics and cybersecurity workshops are . The final agenda will be shared next week. Regarding sponsorship, we offer packages that brand exposure through tailored sessions. To maximize visibility, we suggest a booth in the expo hall. Could you clarify which software solutions you plan to during your session? We also recommend with panelists pre-event to align discussions.
Best,
Marcus Tan, Event Coordinator
Part 2: Reading to Apply a Diagram
Vegetable Vendors Section
- Time
- Saturdays 8:00 AM-2:00 PM, Wednesdays 4:00 PM-7:00 PM.
- Cost
- Varies by item; bulk discounts available.
- Booking
- No reservations; early arrival suggested for fresh picks.
- Notes
- Organic certifications displayed; sampling encouraged. Bring reusable bags; arrive 15 minutes before closing for deals. Membership: Loyalty cards for 10% off repeat purchases.
Fruit Stands Area
- Time
- Year-round Fridays 9:00 AM-3:00 PM.
- Cost
- Seasonal pricing; $5 per basket specials.
- Booking
- Pre-order online at farmersmarket.net for large quantities.
- Notes
- Exotic imports weekly; allergy info posted. Weather shelters provided; no pets near food. Special: Tasting events monthly; refunds for spoiled goods.
Dairy and Eggs Zone
- Time
- Sundays 10:00 AM-1:00 PM.
- Cost
- $4 per dozen eggs, $6 cheese wheels.
- Booking
- Subscriptions via app for weekly deliveries.
- Notes
- Farm-fresh guarantees; coolers recommended. Arrive with cash; card fees apply. Discounts: Seniors 15% off; group buys encouraged.
Baked Goods Corner
- Time
- Daily pop-ups 7:00 AM-11:00 AM.
- Cost
- $3 per loaf, $2 pastries.
- Booking
- Reserve custom orders by email [email protected].
- Notes
- Gluten-free options; fresh-baked aromas. Limited quantities; first-come basis. Events: Workshops quarterly; cancelations 48 hours prior.
Artisan Crafts Booth
- Time
- Weekends 11:00 AM-4:00 PM.
- Cost
- Handmade items from $10; haggling allowed.
- Booking
- Vendor spots bookable online.
- Notes
- Local artists featured; eco-friendly materials. Bring exact change; photography permitted. Perks: Raffles for buyers; no returns on custom pieces.
Read the following email message. Complete the email by filling in the blanks. Select the best choice for each blank.
Subject: Probing Stall Layout and Vendor Policies
Hello Market Organizers,
The stall layout in your brochure appears thoughtfully , showcasing a vibrant mix of produce and crafts, though the time restrictions for certain zones could inadvertently evening shoppers who prefer Wednesdays over crowded Saturdays. As a regular patron, I frequently the Dairy Zone's subscription model with the no-reserve policy in Vegetables, finding the former more convenient yet potentially exclusionary.
Does the loyalty card discount apply market-wide, or is it zone-specific? This ambiguity might perceived value, especially if compared to uniform perks at rival markets. Moreover, the no-pets rule near food is sensible, but clarification on service animals would help in your commitment to accessibility amid growing community diversity.
Thank you for your response.
Sincerely,
Jordan Hayes
What implied inequity does the sender suggest in the brochure's timing arrangements?
How does the email indirectly challenge the brochure's discount consistency?
What underlying aim could the sender have by referencing service animals?
Part 3: Reading for Information
Paragraph A
Aztec featherwork, known as amanteca, was a revered craft in Mesoamerica, creating dazzling mosaics for nobles and rituals. Artisans used vibrant feathers from macaws and quetzals, prized for their iridescence. These works adorned shields, headdresses, and ceremonial cloaks, symbolizing divine power. The craft required precision, as feathers were layered onto cotton or agave bases. Only elite artists, trained from childhood, mastered the technique. Surviving pieces, like Montezuma’s headdress, are displayed in museums.
Paragraph B
The process of featherwork was complex and resource-intensive. Artisans trapped birds humanely or traded for feathers from distant regions. Colors were arranged to mimic paintings, with no adhesives until Spanish contact introduced glue. Guilds controlled quality, ensuring flawless designs for emperors. Featherwork was fragile, vulnerable to humidity and insects. Preservation today relies on climate-controlled storage.
Paragraph C
Featherwork held deep cultural significance in Aztec society. It honored deities like Quetzalcoatl, the feathered serpent, linking art to spirituality. Gifts of featherwork strengthened alliances between city-states. The Spanish conquest in 1521 disrupted the craft, as many pieces were destroyed or looted. Modern Mexican artists revive the tradition, using synthetic feathers to avoid harming birds. Exhibitions raise awareness of its historical value.
Paragraph D
Challenges in reviving featherwork include scarcity of traditional materials. Quetzal birds are now protected, limiting access to authentic feathers. Workshops teach the craft, but few artisans achieve historical mastery. Technology aids preservation, with 3D scans documenting fragile originals. Featherwork inspires modern fashion, like runway designs mimicking Aztec patterns. The art form endures as a symbol of cultural resilience.
Decide which paragraph, (A) to (D), has the information given in each statement below. Select (E) if the information is not given in any of the paragraphs.
- Aztec featherwork adorned ceremonial headdresses for noble rituals. A
- All feathers for Aztec art were sourced from local bird populations. E
- Guilds ensured high-quality featherwork designs for Aztec emperors. B
- Featherwork paid tribute to the deity Quetzalcoatl in Aztec culture. C
- Modern artisans use synthetic feathers to protect endangered birds. C
- Traditional featherwork always relied on glue for feather adhesion. E
- 3D scanning technology helps preserve fragile featherwork originals. D
- Aztec featherwork has been completely restored to its former glory. E
- Workshops teach aspiring artisans the skills of ancient featherwork. D
Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints
The legalization of ride-sharing services has ignited debates on fostering innovation versus ensuring regulatory oversight. Enthusiasts praise their disruptive potential for transportation efficiency. Tech analyst Nina Patel declares, "Platforms like Uber have increased ride availability by 50% in urban centers, per industry reports, offering flexible employment and reducing drunk driving incidents." Proponents argue that minimal barriers encourage entrepreneurship, with data from the Brookings Institution showing economic boosts through job creation and consumer savings.
Skeptics, often from traditional taxi sectors, demand stringent regulations to protect public interests. Union representative Carlos Mendoza retorts, "Unregulated services undercut fares, leading to a 25% income drop for licensed drivers and safety lapses, as highlighted in government audits." Critics emphasize risks like inadequate background checks and surge pricing exploitation, advocating for licensing parity. They reference cases of market monopolies stifling competition. Intermediaries recommend collaborative frameworks with safety standards to leverage innovation while upholding fairness. This contention illustrates the clash between technological progress and equitable market practices, urging legislators to devise adaptive policies that safeguard all stakeholders.
What innovation does Nina Patel attribute to ride-sharing services?
From the passage, what can be inferred about Brookings Institution data?
How does Carlos Mendoza's perspective challenge enthusiasts?
What implied intention drives intermediaries' recommendation for frameworks?
Which element indicates a bias toward traditional sectors?
The following is a comment by a reader. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.
Embracing ride-sharing for its convenience and job opportunities is tempting, yet unchecked expansion often established industries and consumer protections. Reports on efficiency are persuasive, but they sometimes vulnerabilities in driver vetting. Proponents ought to equitable rules that level the playing field. In my opinion, hybrid licensing could innovative edges without compromising safety. Governance should progress against accountability to prevent exploitative practices while promoting inclusive mobility solutions.
Answer key
Show all 38 answers
- What is the primary purpose of the email? B. To confirm participation and inquire
- What can be inferred about the company’s goals? B. They seek industry collaboration.
- How does the sender convey enthusiasm? B. By using positive language
- What is the implied benefit of sponsoring a session? B. To showcase their expertise
- Which question focuses on strategic exposure? D. Maximizing visibility
- What bias might the sender exhibit? A. Overestimation of their influence
- B. confirmed
- B. enhance
- B. securing
- B. showcase
- B. collaborating
- B. arranged
- B. disadvantage
- A. contrast
- B. diminish
- A. assessing
- What implied inequity does the sender suggest in the brochure's timing arrangements? B. Possible bias against certain shoppers
- How does the email indirectly challenge the brochure's discount consistency? B. Through revealing potential limitations
- What underlying aim could the sender have by referencing service animals? A. To advocate for enhanced inclusivity
- Aztec featherwork adorned ceremonial headdresses for noble rituals. A A
- All feathers for Aztec art were sourced from local bird populations. E E
- Guilds ensured high-quality featherwork designs for Aztec emperors. B B
- Featherwork paid tribute to the deity Quetzalcoatl in Aztec culture. C C
- Modern artisans use synthetic feathers to protect endangered birds. C C
- Traditional featherwork always relied on glue for feather adhesion. E E
- 3D scanning technology helps preserve fragile featherwork originals. D D
- Aztec featherwork has been completely restored to its former glory. E E
- Workshops teach aspiring artisans the skills of ancient featherwork. D D
- What innovation does Nina Patel attribute to ride-sharing services? C. Enhancing access and safety through expanded options.
- From the passage, what can be inferred about Brookings Institution data? A. It supports economic advantages like jobs and savings.
- How does Carlos Mendoza's perspective challenge enthusiasts? D. Mendoza focuses on economic and safety harms, opposing innovation gains.
- What implied intention drives intermediaries' recommendation for frameworks? B. To integrate innovation with regulations for balanced outcomes.
- Which element indicates a bias toward traditional sectors? C. The assertion of income declines and safety lapses.
- B. undermines
- C. minimize
- C. advocate
- D. harness
- B. balance
What does your score mean? See the CELPIP Reading score chart.
CELPass is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with Paragon Testing Enterprises. CELPIP is a trademark of Paragon Testing Enterprises. Check the official CELPIP website and IRCC for current test rules and requirements.