CELPIP Reading Part 1 Practice Test: Follow-up on Lost Luggage Claim
By Iris
A free Reading Part 1 practice test in the CELPIP format: 11 questions with the answer key. Choose your answers, then check them at the bottom of the page.
Dear Customer Service Team,
I am writing to inquire about the status of my lost luggage claim, reference number LR-7842, filed on June 10 after my flight from Tokyo to London. The missing suitcase contained essential documents and personal items, causing significant inconvenience. Despite providing detailed descriptions and receipts, I have received no updates beyond the initial acknowledgment. Your policy states claims are resolved within 30 days, yet 45 days have elapsed. I urgently request clarification on the investigation’s progress and an estimated resolution timeline.
Could you provide an update by tomorrow? Please outline any additional information required to expedite the process. How might you compensate for the prolonged delay and its impact?
What is the primary intent of the email?
What can be inferred about the sender’s situation?
How does the sender assert their position?
What is the implied impact of the delay?
Which question addresses accountability?
What bias might the sender exhibit?
Here is a response to the message. Complete the response by filling in the blanks. Select the best choice for each blank.
Dear Passenger,
We regret the delay in resolving claim LR-7842. Our team is the investigation, which was delayed due to incomplete documentation. We’ve located a suitcase matching your description and are its contents. An update will be sent by tomorrow. To expedite, please confirm the bag’s unique markings. Regarding compensation, we are options to address the inconvenience. Could you specify if you prefer or replacement of items? We are committed to this matter promptly.
Sincerely,
Ahmed Khan, Claims Officer
Answer key
Show all 11 answers
- What is the primary intent of the email? B. To seek claim status and resolution
- What can be inferred about the sender’s situation? B. They faced considerable disruption.
- How does the sender assert their position? A. By citing the airline’s policy
- What is the implied impact of the delay? B. It increased sender frustration.
- Which question addresses accountability? C. Compensating for delay
- What bias might the sender exhibit? A. Overexpectation of immediate resolution
- B. advancing
- B. verifying
- B. exploring
- B. reimbursement
- A. resolving
More Part 1 sample tests
- Follow-up on Missing Pet Report (next)
- Inquiry About Lost Package Delivery
- Invitation to Attend Company Safety Training
- Invitation to Participate in Health Screening
- Neighborhood Watch Meeting
- Notification of Change in Office Recycling Procedures
- Notification of Temporary Road Closure
- Office Relocation Notice
- Parking Policy Update
- Proposal for a Community Storytelling Festival
All 51 Part 1 sample tests · Part 1 format, tips and FAQs · Full-length Reading practice tests
CELPass is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with Paragon Testing Enterprises. CELPIP is a trademark of Paragon Testing Enterprises. Check the official CELPIP website and IRCC for current test rules and requirements.