CELPIP Reading Part 3 Practice Test: How An Octopus Builds Camouflage

Paragraph A

An octopus can change visible skin pattern in less than a second because chromatophores are controlled directly by nerves. Each chromatophore is an elastic sac of pigment surrounded by radial muscles. When the muscles contract, the sac expands into a coloured disc; when they relax, it shrinks and becomes less visible. Chromatophores supply yellow, red, brown, or dark components, but other cells modify the result. Iridophores reflect selected wavelengths and can appear iridescent, while leucophores scatter the available light more broadly. These layers do not operate as independent paint pots. Their combined expansion, reflection, and scattering produces brightness and colour that change with viewing angle and illumination. This perspective preserves distinctions that a simpler summary of the evidence would overlook.

Paragraph B

Matching colour is only part of concealment. Muscles in the skin raise papillae that turn a smooth surface into bumps, ridges, or branching shapes, helping the body resemble rock, algae, or coral. The animal also changes posture and arm position to alter its outline. Octopus vision appears limited in conventional colour discrimination in many studied species, yet the animals respond effectively to brightness, contrast, edge orientation, and polarized light; how these cues support colour choice remains under investigation. The skin may also contain light-sensitive molecules, but detecting light locally does not by itself prove that the skin independently selects an entire camouflage pattern. Viewed in combination, these details provide a fuller explanation than any single observation could support by itself.

Paragraph C

Octopuses use several broad pattern strategies rather than making a pixel-by-pixel copy of every background. A uniform pattern can suit a relatively even surface. A mottled pattern breaks the body into small patches, while a disruptive pattern uses large contrasting components to obscure the recognizable outline. The chosen display may emphasize a few dominant features of the scene, such as object size, edge density, and overall contrast. If concealment fails, the animal can switch to a high-contrast warning display, release ink, or jet away. The most visually accurate background match is therefore not always the best response when a predator is already close. Together, the evidence develops a broader explanation while retaining the distinct role and limitation of every observation.

Paragraph D

To study camouflage, researchers photograph animals on controlled substrates and quantify pattern scale, contrast, and texture. Camera calibration matters because ordinary images record light differently from the eyes of fish, birds, or marine mammals. A pattern that looks convincing to a human observer may remain detectable in ultraviolet or polarization channels available to a predator. Laboratory backgrounds permit controlled comparisons, whereas field observations include realistic shadows, movement, and viewing distances; neither setting alone shows survival benefit. Strong tests connect measured appearance with a predator's visual system and, when ethically possible, its detection or attack behaviour rather than treating human resemblance scores as the final standard. This synthesis links the separate points while preserving the conditions that qualify each one.

Paragraph E

Not given in any of the above paragraphs.