CELPIP Writing Task 2 Sample Answer: Affordable Internet Access Survey

I believe the most equitable approach for increasing affordable internet access is to provide free Wi-Fi in all public spaces (Option A). This strategy addresses the needs of a diverse population, including students, low-income individuals, travelers, and those without stable housing. Public Wi-Fi zones create opportunities for people to work, study, and communicate without financial barriers, fostering greater digital inclusion. While offering subsidies to low-income families is valuable, it only helps those with a permanent address and does not address broader accessibility challenges. By implementing widespread public Wi-Fi, the city ensures that everyone—regardless of background or living situation—can access vital online resources.

In my view, providing free Wi-Fi zones in public places is the best way to improve affordable internet access. With Wi-Fi in parks, libraries, and transit stations, people who cannot pay for home internet still have a way to get online. This is important for students, people looking for jobs, or anyone needing to contact family. While giving subsidies to low-income families is helpful, it does not help people who are between homes or just visiting the city. Option A ensures everyone has a fair chance to connect, no matter their situation. That’s why I would choose to expand free public Wi-Fi.

I believe my city should give free Wi-Fi in all public spaces. Many people, like students or job seekers, go to the park or library to use the internet. If there is free Wi-Fi in these places, everyone can connect without worrying about money. Sometimes, I need to check my email or do homework outside my house, so this would help me. Subsidies for families are helpful, but public Wi-Fi helps more people, like visitors or people who do not have a home. I choose option A because it makes internet easy to use for everyone, not just for some families.